President Bush’s “San Francisco Values”: A Futuristic Nightmare That Has, Alas, Already Happened
By John Lofton, Editor
“Do we really want Nancy Pelosi’s San Francisco values leading the culture war?” — Ex-Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert.
“Nancy Pelosi represents a San Francisco value system that…the country would disagree with very deeply.” — Newt Gingrich, Fox News Network.
“Most of America doesn’t know about Nancy Pelosi. That to me is dangerous in an election, if the voting population is actually ignorant of where she has stood, her San Francisco values.” — Sean Hannity, Fox News.
“‘San Francisco values,’ I guess, means, you know, that she’s friendly to gay people. It’s code for that.” — Fox News media analyst Jane Hall.
SECRETARY RICE swears in sodomite Mark Dybul; sodomite ‘partner’ in attendance; Mrs. Bush witnesses this abomination. And yes, that is a Bible the two sodomites are touching - the same Bible saying what Dybul/’partner’ are/do is a crime deserving death. Late at night, after changing channels and traveling through the wilderness of cable TV, where I heard and saw numerous references to “SAN FRANCISCO VALUES!!!,” I lay down to sleep. And as I slept — fitfully, tossing and turning — I had a hideous nightmare about who had become the next occupant of the White House — Nancy Pelosi!
Oh, noooooooooooo!, as “Mr.Bill” used to exclaim.
The homo-hugging, soft-on-sodomites, liberal-on-lesbians, pervert-pleaser Nancy Pelosi was President of these united States! Now, you might be wondering: How, exactly, did this happen? Well, don’t worry about it. This is my nightmare, OK?, and that part wasn’t explained.
In any event, President Pelosi was definitely “friendly” to “gay people.” Her election resulted in numerous, unprecedented, ubiquitous acts of homo-honoring, God-mockery, blasphemy and sacrilege. Acts such as? Well, such as appointing a known, out-of-the-closet sodomite to be — of all things — the official United States Global AIDS (!) Coordinator.
In my nightmare —as if it was not bad enough to appoint a sodomite to such an office — this sodomite (S1) was sworn into office in a public ceremony at the State Department, a ceremony attended by a broadly-smiling Secretary of State and the First Husband Mr. Pelosi. Also in attendance was another sodomite (S2) who was referred to euphemistically by the Secretary of State as the “partner” of S1. The mother of S2 was in the audience. The Secretary of State of State called her the “mother-in-law” of S1.
But the worst was yet to come. Adding insult (to God) to injury, the sodomite being sworn in (S1) had his left hand on a Bible which was being held by S2, his sodomite “partner!”
During this surrealistic, nauseating ceremony, the Secretary of State said she was “truly honored and delighted” to swear-in this sodomite. In front of these two sodomites, she actually used the words “moral challenge” to describe the fight against AIDS. And she called AIDS “this terrible disease” — which it is and which, of course, has been spread, primarily, by sodomites.
OK. So, if you follow the news closely, you know that this, alas, is not a dream I had about a possible future. This is something that has already been done by the Bush Administration. S1 is Mark Dybul. Look him up on “Google News/Images” for the whole sordid story.
My point: On the homosexual issue, President Bush and his Administration differ in no major, substantive way from those dreaded “SAN FRANCISCO VALUES!!!”
The President, supposedly a Christian, has made it clear that he really doesn’t care if some people are homosexuals. In a little-noticed and widely-unreported comment at Kutztown University in Kutztown, Pennsylvania (7/9/04), Mr. Bush was asked about banning homosexual “marriage.” He replied, in part:
“And I repeat to you — my own view is, is that if a state — if people decide to — what they do in the privacy of their house, consenting adults should be able to do. This is America. It’s a free society. But it doesn’t mean we have to redefine traditional marriage” (emphasis mine).
The “consenting adults” argument is, of course, the same argument sodomites make for practicing their vile, perverted sex. And to say that “consenting adult” sodomites can practice their perversion because America is “a free society” is shockingly ludicrous and outrageous.
Shortly before the election in 2004, in an interview with ABC’s Charles Gibson, Mr. Bush unceremoniously threw the GOP Platform in the trash saying that he didn’t care what this document said, he was for “civil unions” for homosexuals which is — de facto, for all practical purposes — the same thing as being for homosexuals being allowed to “marry.”
Robert Knight, at the time Director of the Culture And Family Institute of the Concerned Women For America, said: “Civil unions are a government endorsement of homosexuality.” He added that “counterfeits” of marriage, such as civil unions, “hurt the real thing.”
Randy Thomasson, executive director of Campaign For California Families, has said: “Here’s the truth, civil unions are homosexual marriage by another name. Civil unions rob marriage of its uniqueness and award homosexuals all the rights of marriage available under state law. Bush needs to understand what’s going on and resist counterfeit marriages with all his might no matter what they are called.”
Other Christian conservatives have made these same points. In mid-January of 2002, in a nationwide broadcast, “Focus On The Family” President Dr. James Dobson, “Alliance Defense Fund” President Alan Sears and “Family Research Council” President Ken Connor called on Christians to oppose a California bill (Assembly Bill 1338) which would establish civil unions for homosexuals in that state. A “Focus On The Family” press release about this broadcast said: “Dobson, Sears and Connor predicted that the enactment of civil unions would lead to the legal recognition of group marriage and other non-traditional relationships.” Dr. Dobson is quoted as saying: “If marriage means everything, it means nothing.”
Don Wildmon, president of the “American Family Association,” has said, about himself and Mike Farris, president of Patrick Henry College: “Both of us would like to have the strongest Federal marriage amendment possible. One that would ban ‘civil unions’ as well as homosexual marriage.”
So, did Dobson, Wildmon & Company blast Bush and say they would not support him because of his cave-in on homosexual “civil unions” which are, basically, the same thing as homosexual “marriage”? No, they continued to cheerlead for his re-election despite his being out of focus on the God-defined, one man/one woman only marriage issue.
Even conservative Senate Republicans, like Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, who are supposed to be hard-line, Bible-believing Christians, are mush when pressed on the homosexual issue. When he campaigned for office, he told an audience in Rogers County: “The gay community has infiltrated the very centers of power. They are the greatest threat, that agenda is the greatest threat to our freedom we face today.”
OK, so President Bush appoints to the Supreme Court Sam Alito who as a college senior at Princeton University wrote a report that recommended the repeal of laws that made perverted sex between homosexuals a crime and urged new anti-discrimination laws for sodomites in the workplace. On NBC’s “Meet The Press” (11/9/05), Coburn is asked if he’ll raise the homo issue with Alito when he questions him at his confirmation hearing?
Well, no, “probably not,” says Coburn, but he will ask Alito about “foreign law and utilization of foreign law and making decisions in this country which I think totally violates their oath,” blah, blah, blah.
Coburn’s questioner then reminds him of what he said when he was campaigning, you know, the bit about homos infiltrating centers of power, being the greatest threat to freedom, etc. To which Timid Tom says well, yes, the homo agenda is dangerous:
“It’s a threat to undermine the family. It does undermine the family. And if you look at the structural problems with our country today, what is happening to us at every level as a nation and in our culture? Our families are falling apart. If you look at how we spend money in the federal government, the increasing amounts that we’re spending are to attack—attack—the very problems where the family is falling apart.”
Question: “So aren’t Judge Alito’s views on gay rights relevant to this discussion for you?”
Coburn: “I believe he can have views on gay rights very different than mine and still make a great Supreme Court justice.”
What Bush, Coburn and their ilk prove is that you don’t have to be from San Francisco to have “SAN FRANCISCO VALUES!!!” Arghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!