wmgreene
18th December 2005, 11:17
As I stated in this post (http://www.theamericanview.com/forums/showthread.php?t=230), our own government is not a government of freedom but of slavery in which the status of citizenship is reclassified from that of American to US or Federal Citizens. And, in this post (http://www.theamericanview.com/forums/showthread.php?t=209), I explained by belief that Mr. Peroutka is a very competent individual to speak to many of my concerns:
To explain, although I am legally homeless, having only a PO Box to receive mail and therefore not eligible to vote, during the last election Mr. Peroutka stated that if he were elected he would undo the New Deal of 1934. For months, I attempted to tell others of this campaign promise, explaining that for truck drivers like myself that would mean we could throw away our logbooks because for the first time since 1939 we would again have our Right of Citizenship back; including the Right to Contract, Freedom of Movement and other Rights such as 5th Amendment Rights.
Focusing on the Right of American truck drivers to not incriminate ourselves, other truck drivers would respond with something to the effect “but you have to have logbooks otherwise these guys out here would work themselves until they dropped.” And, my response was “OK but your saying that murders and rapists should have the right to not incriminate themselves but hard working people should not?” Of course, this was enough that I would always win the argument, but I was still in error given that the 5th Amendment appears to define the Rights of “persons” rather than that of “We The ‘People.’”
...
I mean, I am more than a little bit upset to think that because of the reformation Act of 1933 and New Deal of 1934 I and my wife as truck drivers are regulated as government property under the Commerce Act to the degree that if we don’t document where and when where we go to the bathroom as well as where and when we go to bed together then we are criminals subject to fines in excess of a thousand dollars or more each...
So my questions are, (1) would the CP develop a one page public statement, promising to restore the basic rights of citizenship to truck drivers if the next candidate is elected, and (2) if so, what type of a donation would be required of me to finance the research necessary to develop such a campaign promise?
I know I would be very grateful for the opportunity to ask permission and leave copies of this type of campaign materials at literally hundreds of travel centers across America. I would also attempt to get it republished in trucker magazines. There is also a possibility that I could get Banta Publishing to republish it in mass, and I’m sure that other truck drivers would follow instructions to access internet sites to gain more info and printout this info to help inform others.
Again, I would be willing to provide a donation to finance the research necessary to develop such a campaign promise, but I’m not sure if the CP would be interested in my request, nor do I have any idea of the up front research costs to develop these types of materials.
Blessings,
Bill
To explain, although I am legally homeless, having only a PO Box to receive mail and therefore not eligible to vote, during the last election Mr. Peroutka stated that if he were elected he would undo the New Deal of 1934. For months, I attempted to tell others of this campaign promise, explaining that for truck drivers like myself that would mean we could throw away our logbooks because for the first time since 1939 we would again have our Right of Citizenship back; including the Right to Contract, Freedom of Movement and other Rights such as 5th Amendment Rights.
Focusing on the Right of American truck drivers to not incriminate ourselves, other truck drivers would respond with something to the effect “but you have to have logbooks otherwise these guys out here would work themselves until they dropped.” And, my response was “OK but your saying that murders and rapists should have the right to not incriminate themselves but hard working people should not?” Of course, this was enough that I would always win the argument, but I was still in error given that the 5th Amendment appears to define the Rights of “persons” rather than that of “We The ‘People.’”
...
I mean, I am more than a little bit upset to think that because of the reformation Act of 1933 and New Deal of 1934 I and my wife as truck drivers are regulated as government property under the Commerce Act to the degree that if we don’t document where and when where we go to the bathroom as well as where and when we go to bed together then we are criminals subject to fines in excess of a thousand dollars or more each...
So my questions are, (1) would the CP develop a one page public statement, promising to restore the basic rights of citizenship to truck drivers if the next candidate is elected, and (2) if so, what type of a donation would be required of me to finance the research necessary to develop such a campaign promise?
I know I would be very grateful for the opportunity to ask permission and leave copies of this type of campaign materials at literally hundreds of travel centers across America. I would also attempt to get it republished in trucker magazines. There is also a possibility that I could get Banta Publishing to republish it in mass, and I’m sure that other truck drivers would follow instructions to access internet sites to gain more info and printout this info to help inform others.
Again, I would be willing to provide a donation to finance the research necessary to develop such a campaign promise, but I’m not sure if the CP would be interested in my request, nor do I have any idea of the up front research costs to develop these types of materials.
Blessings,
Bill