30: Refutes Big Lie That Precedent Is Binding On All Lower Court Judges

[TheGeneral]

Our 30th nationally-syndicated, one-hour radio show, "The American View," refutes the Big Lie that we've heard over and over which says that precedent (stare decisis) is binding and that lower court judges must follow the rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court. Joining us in our discussion is Scott T. Whiteman, Esq., Managing Editor of this Web page. His article on this subject is on this page is titled "Stare Non Determinus."

Link to full article:
http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=446

[exmarine]

Our 30th nationally-syndicated, one-hour radio show, "The American View," refutes the Big Lie that we've heard over and over which says that precedent (stare decisis) is binding and that lower court judges must follow the rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court. Joining us in our discussion is Scott T. Whiteman, Esq., Managing Editor of this Web page. His article on this subject is on this page is titled "Stare Non Determinus."

Link to full article:
http://www.theamericanview.com/index.php?id=446


Someone needs to tell this to Samel Alito.

[Joe_Liberty]

Thanks for doing this show to clarify Scott's earlier essay. It is helpful in responding to lawyers I know who have objected that Michael Peroutka couldn't possibly believe what I thought he said he believed.