PDA

View Full Version : Bush Nominates Roberts As Chief Justice


Chome
5th September 2005, 09:40
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050905/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus


WASHINGTON - President Bush on Monday nominated John Roberts to succeed William H. Rehnquist as chief justice, and called on the Senate to confirm him before the Supreme Court opens its fall term on Oct. 3.

The swift move would promote to the Supreme Court's top job a man who currently is being considered as one of eight associate justices.

"I am honored and humbled by the confidence the president has shown in me," Roberts said, standing alongside Bush in the Oval Office. "I am very much aware that if I am confirmed I would succeed a man I deeply respect and admire, a man who has been very kind to me for 25 years."

"He's a man of integrity and fairness and throughout his life he's inspired the respect and loyalty of others," Bush said. "John Roberts built a record of excellence and achievement and reputation for goodwill and decency toward others. in his extraordinary career."

The selection of Roberts, who has drawn little criticism, helps Bush avoid new political problems when he already is under fire for the government's sluggish response to Hurricane Katrina and the president's approval ratings are sagging.

Getting a new chief justice of Bush's choosing in place quickly also avoids the scenario of having liberal Justice John Paul Stevens making the decisions about whom to assign cases to and making other decisions that could influence court deliberations. As the court's senior justice, Stevens would take over Rehnquist's administrative duties until a new chief is confirmed.

"The passing of Chief Justice William Rehnquist leaves the center chair empty, just four weeks left before the Supreme Court reconvenes," Bush said. "It's in the interest of the court and the country to have a chief justice on the bench on the first full day of the fall term."

Bush said Roberts has been closely scrutinized since he was nominated as an associate justice and that Americans "like what they see. He is a gentleman. He is a man of integrity and fairness." He said Roberts has unusual experience, having argued 39 cases as a lawyer before the Supreme Court. Bush also said Roberts was a natural leader.

The move was engineered to have all nine seats on the high court filled when the court opens its fall term.

Bush already had nominated Roberts to fill the seat of retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. It requires just take a little paper shuffling to change the nomination for Rehnquist's seat. Bush still must fill O'Connor's seat but she has promised to stay on the court until a successor is name.

Areopagus
5th September 2005, 10:02
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050905/ap_on_go_su_co/scotus


WASHINGTON - President Bush on Monday nominated John Roberts to succeed William H. Rehnquist as chief justice, and called on the Senate to confirm him before the Supreme Court opens its fall term on Oct. 3.



Howard Phillips, Speaks On Judge John Roberts
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/aug/050816b.html

John Roberts is no Scalia
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45379

JOHN ROBERTS – W’S SOUTER
http://grasstopsusa.com/080805.html
Roberts subverted Reagan
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45813

Souter in Roberts' clothing
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45363

Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, Jr.:Wrong Man, Wrong Place, Wrong Time!
http://www.jewsformorality.org/roberts050808.htm

exmarine
5th September 2005, 11:19
Howard Phillips, Speaks On Judge John Roberts
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/aug/050816b.html

John Roberts is no Scalia
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45379

JOHN ROBERTS – W’S SOUTER
http://grasstopsusa.com/080805.html
Roberts subverted Reagan
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45813

Souter in Roberts' clothing
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=45363

Supreme Court Nominee John G. Roberts, Jr.:Wrong Man, Wrong Place, Wrong Time!
http://www.jewsformorality.org/roberts050808.htm

Yes, it's quite clear to me that many people are being duped into thinking that Roberts is a pro-lilfe constructionist. Aeropagus, why are you trying to confuse people with the facts?

Most Americans do not think for themselves, they allow others to do their ''thinnin" for them. Like all other issues, the issue of Roberts' nomination is framed for them by the media, Republicans, and Democrats -- and presented to the American people in a neat little package, tightly wrapped to include all sides of the story.

I had to laugh this morning while watching one of the mainstream news programs. One commentator remarked that the Court had moved right since the 1970s. (Haha!...and I have a bridge I want to sell...) And the itching ears of all the liberal-minded folk perked up.

Today, people will listen to Rush Limbaugh who will likely pontificate for the umpteenth time about what a great and wise choice Roberts is...and the itching ears of all of the naive conservative sheeple will perk up.

exmarine
5th September 2005, 11:32
Bush said Roberts has been closely scrutinized since he was nominated as an associate justice and that Americans "like what they see. He is a gentleman. He is a man of integrity and fairness." He said Roberts has unusual experience, having argued 39 cases as a lawyer before the Supreme Court. Bush also said Roberts was a natural leader.



"Genteman," man of "integrity and fairness" and "experienced": I'm so sick of hearing these patheticly nebulous and essentially meaningless accolades. Such descriptions say a whole lot of nothing about the man's moral character.

Gentelman? I don't care whether or not he opens doors for his wife, and speaks in polite tones.
Experienced? At what? Defending homosexuals and vowing to enforce Roe v. Wade?
Fairness? According to what standard? Man's or God's?
Integrity? Integrity in relation to what...his steadfastness in upholding the unconstitutional rulings of previous judges?

Chome
5th September 2005, 12:38
Today, people will listen to Rush Limbaugh who will likely pontificate for the umpteenth time about what a great and wise choice Roberts is...and the itching ears of all of the naive conservative sheeple will perk up.

Yeah and Limbaugh is a big fan of Clarence Thomas. He even did his marriage for him. What's gonna be fun to listen to is Rush try to explain away why Clarence Thomas or Scalia should not have gotten it after all the years of praising them.

I'm sure Rush is sitting there right now with a long speech about how Roberts was a better choice then Thomas.

Of course I already know the answer. Nominating Roberts for Chief Justice was easy. Nominating Thomas would have required a fight and we know Republicans just don't have that in them.

TheSeventhStooge
5th September 2005, 10:52
Of course I already know the answer. Nominating Roberts for Chief Justice was easy. Nominating Thomas would have required a fight and we know Republicans just don't have that in them.

Fight?

I am not sure if the Republicans know the meaning of that word...

TheSeventhStooge...